Ending India’s dependence on coal, will produce more electricity from renewable energy by 2040

India will produce more electricity from renewable energy by 2040 than it does from coal. This will require a rapid transition away from coal. Increasing the amount of renewable energy would also require the government to convert older coal-fired power plants to natural gas. It would also require a faster deployment of nuclear power and other energy sources. These technologies will help India to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels.

Photo by Tom Fisk on Pexels.com

India has a growing movement to wean the country off coal, but it’s not as easy as some people think. The coal industry is huge, and the country is heavily dependent on it for its power. In this sense, diversifying the economy is incredibly important for the country since coal is the main source of electricity. Nearly 200 million tons of coal, the country imports each year and is the largest consumer. Moreover, coal exports to other countries have soared over the last several years. Despite the recent upswing in international oil prices, India’s dependence on coal remains substantial. The world’s largest consumer of coal, it is unlikely to completely phase out coal by 2030 or 2040. However, it can drastically cut its imports over the next decade.

There are numerous ways to reduce India’s dependence on coal. But one of the most challenging ways to do it is by reducing its consumption of coal. Cleaner charcoal is one solution but isn’t cost-effective yet. Many of these cleaner alternatives require a substantial upfront investment and are therefore not economically viable. The state-owned behemoths of coal mining are not presently economical or environmentally sustainable.

In 2009, 525 electric power plants were running on coal, which generated roughly 62% of the country’s electricity. Coal accounts for a greater share of energy consumption than all other fuels combined. Since India has a dependence on coal as a source of electricity, ending dependence will be quite difficult to achieve.

This dependence on coal began when India was still under British rule and needed the energy to power its factories and transportation; at that time, coal was cheap to mine, and it resulted in the state government giving out coal mines as concessions to private companies. Consequently, the dependency mentality became ingrained into Indian culture as cheap power generated from fossil fuels made manufacturing very profitable, and this dependence was passed down from generation to generation.

While the coal-consuming countries are tackling the problems of climate change, developing countries are lagging and are in a position to make a major transition. Reducing coal consumption will be difficult in developing countries, but it is a relatively straightforward process in developed nations. Moreover, the government should ramp up its coal production and ensure that it reaches power plants faster.

The burning of coal is not only bad for the environment; it is also bad for the lives of coal workers. The local communities and rural communities are disadvantaged. A fast transition off of coal would have terrible human consequences. A large-scale transition away from the coal-based economy would be unwise and would be a waste of money. Nevertheless, a gradual shift from the coal-dependent economy is good for the environment and people’s health.

Courtesy: Markus Spiske on Pexels.com

To make a smooth transition off coal, India must diversify its economy. The Indian coal industry is highly reliant on coal. Its workers depend on it for their livelihoods and support. As a result, it needs to move towards a low-carbon economy that is more sustainable for the country and the environment. The government needs to be proactive and stop the coal-based economy.

But it is not easy to end the dependence on coal. India can’t end its dependency on coal. Some market participants believe that the government will support the coal-burning plants in procuring more coal from overseas. Nonetheless, they cannot afford to stop mining because of the economic benefits of using coal. If the government wants to reduce its carbon footprint, it should reduce fuel consumption.

It is a fact that coal is a key domestic resource for India. Even though the per capita consumption of coal is only three-fifths of the OECD average, India is still the largest coal-mining nation globally. And the state is already a top producer of coal. With this, the country is a leader in global energy and a world leader in energy security.

It is difficult to force India to end its dependence on coal. The Indian government has pledged to generate 50% of its energy needs from renewables by 2030, but it has faced many challenges in this regard. Its government is highly dependent on subsidies and other forms of state and local infrastructure. It also has to reduce its demand for the fuel itself. In the long run, a move away from coal will help end mining-related crimes.

Although India’s dependence on coal seems inevitable at this point, some steps can be taken to make the transition easier and more efficient and therefore reduce our carbon footprint. One way to do this is by using renewable energy-generated electricity and distributed solar power generation. If we use more renewables, we will reduce our dependence on coal. By reducing CO2 emissions and increasing the mileage of vehicles, it is also possible to reduce fossil fuel dependence by reducing emissions in public transportation and personal vehicles. Bringing up green fuel solutions over time will gradually shift India from Fossil fuel dependency to green solution energy dependency. 

Another green energy solutions are renewable energy which is one of the best ways to cut down on pollution and greenhouse gases. However, it is expensive compared with fossil fuels. Therefore, the government should subsidize the development of renewable energy. By doing so, the cost of electricity will be lower, and the poor will benefit.

Courtesy: Yan Krukov on Pexels.com

If the government provides subsidies, then the consumer will buy the product at a lower price. There will be more competition between different producers. So, the government should incentivize the production of renewable energy.

If the government does not do so, then people will continue to consume electricity produced from coal. They will not want to change to the cleanest form of energy available. The result will be environmental degradation and climate change.

The government should also encourage the private sector to produce more green energy. For example, it could set up a fund or institute to promote renewable energy projects.

Many companies have invested in developing alternative energy. These include Tesla Motors, SolarCity, Google, Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and IBM. All of these companies have been working hard to find solutions to the problem of global warming.

In addition, some countries like Germany, France, Norway, Denmark, and Sweden have made significant investments in renewable energy. These countries have seen great results. Their governments have reduced their emissions significantly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s